CHANNEL GUIDE
Industry Verticals
Automotive
High-Tech/Electronics
Retail
CPG
Food & Beverage
Pharmaceutical/Bio-Tech
Industrial Manufacturing
Chemicals & Energy
Aerospace & Defense
Service Industries
Apparel

Logistics/Transportation
All Logistics
Global Logistics
Third-Party Logistics
Global Fulfillment & Distribution
Global Trade Management
Inventory Planning/Optimization
Transportation & Distribution
Warehouse Logistics
Reverse Logistics
LTL/Truckload Services
Air Cargo
Ocean Transportation
Rail & Intermodal
Service Parts Management
Facility Location Planning
Value-Added Services

Technology Solutions
All Technology
Asset Management
Business Intelligence & Analytics
Business Process Management
Collaboration & Integration
Customer Relationship Mgmt
EDI Communication (XML/EDI)
ERP & Enterprise Systems
Event Management
Forecasting & Demand Planning
Order Fulfillment & P.O. Mgmt
Product Lifecycle Management
RFID & Wireless
Sales & Operations Planning
Sourcing & Procurement Solutions
Supplier Relationship Mgmt
Supply Chain Analysis & Consulting
SC Finance & Revenue Mgmt
SC Planning & Optimization
Supply Chain Visibility
Transportation Management
Warehouse Management
Manufacturing Planning & Execution Systems
SaaS & On-Demand Systems
Software Architecture & SOA

Research & Analysis
Aberdeen Group
AMR Research
APQC
ARC Advisory Group
Marsh

World Regions
The United States
Asia Pacific
Europe
Middle East/Africa
Latin America
China
Canada

General SCM
Global Supply Chain Mgmt
HR & Labor Management
Environmental
Network Planning
Quality & Metrics
SC Security & Risk Mgmt
Legal, Gov't, & Regulatory Issues
Business Strategy Alignment

Legal, Gov't & Regulatory Issues


Marsh: Most Companies Unprepared for Rising Level of Risk in Their Supply Chains

Global Logistics & Supply Chain Strategies | June 13, 2008

And it isn’t just about fraud. Says Marsh Inc.: “Most businesses are ill-prepared to handle the rising risk levels, caused by more global and complex supply chains that are increasing supplier disruptions, logistics delays, and product recalls and safety issues.” A recent Marsh study of 110 North American risk managers found that none considered their companies to be “highly effective” at supply chain risk management. Just 35 percent saw their organizations as “moderately effective,” while 65 percent described their supply chain risk programs as having “low” or “unknown” effectiveness. Some lacked any formal risk effort at all. Yet nearly three-quarters of the respondents believe their supply chain risk has risen since 2005, and a similar number saw supply chain disruptions as having an increased financial impact. “Concerns about supply chain risks and supplier issues are reverberating in boardrooms and among shareholder groups throughout the U.S.,” says Beth Enslow, author of the report and a senior vice president in Marsh’s Supply Chain Risk Management Practice. “Yet, at this point, most organizations are just beginning to take the steps needed to manage these challenges effectively.” Marsh recommends formation of a cross-functional team involving purchasing, manufacturing, logistics, finance, legal and risk-management. Only 31 percent of respondents have taken that step. Even worse, just 19 percent of companies with more than $1bn in revenue have created such teams. The “siloed” nature of supply chain functions makes it tough for companies to assess their supply chain risks, especially in the areas of product safety and supply dependability, Marsh says.

www.marsh.com



> more Legal, Gov't, & Regulatory Issues articles