A newly-implemented $100,000 fee on H-1B visas could soon force the United States to confront a fundamental dilemma — whether a nation built on a diverse, global workforce can remain a machine for innovation while pricing out the very workers who fuel it.

"This proclamation fundamentally changes the character of the H-1B program," says Shilpa Malik, the manager attorney for U.S. immigration law firm VisaNation. 

Over the years, immigrant labor has directly correlated to innovation and advancement in science and tech in the U.S., all while several of the country's largest tech companies have relied heavily upon H-1B visas to maintain a consistent pipeline of skilled labor. That pipeline doesn’t stop at big tech either — it feeds the backbone of U.S. supply chains, producing a highly-educated workforce leading the charge on the advancement of artificial intelligence, automation, and modernization across the country's warehouses, shipping hubs and manufacturing facilities.

The H-1B program was originally devised as a way to allow U.S. employers to fill specialty roles for engineers, scientists and developers. Over time, Congress has expanded and refined the system, adding rules to prevent abuse, and creating carve-outs for advanced-degree holders. And while the structure has evolved, the core purpose has stayed the same: giving U.S. companies of all shapes and sizes access to global talent to help drive research, development and competitiveness. By adding a hefty $100,000 fee, though, the U.S. is effectively signaling that access to highly-skilled immigrant labor is now a privilege reserved solely for those with the money and resources to pay the toll, Malik says.

Read More: New H-1B Visa Fees Could Undercut U.S. Tech Edge

"The United States built a lot of its foundational 20th century economy and technological innovation on an influx of immigrants," says Jason Levy, counsel for immigration law firm Grossman Young & Hammond, and formerly a senior attorney with the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration Law Division. "That's historically a very reliable way to grow and develop technological capabilities instead of keeping it all in house."

According to research from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), immigrants comprised 23% of the total workforce in STEM occupations in 2016, as well as 26% of U.S.-based Nobel Prize winners between 1990 and 2000. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that immigrants have also been awarded 40% of Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics since 2000, while more than 55% of the country's startups worth more than $1 billion have had at least one immigrant founder. 

Separate data from the NBER found that in periods where H-1B hiring has been more difficult, U.S. multinational corporations (MNCs) have shifted their highly-skilled roles to foreign affiliates, adding roughly 0.4 overseas jobs for every denied H-1B visa. For globalized MNCs — those with more key functions and operations outside the U.S. — the figure more than doubles to 0.9 overseas hires per denial, often concentrated in R&D hubs like Canada, India and China. Which is all to say: a scenario where the U.S. is no longer a viable destination for skilled foreign labor may very well benefit any number of other nations with more lax immigration policies.

"You don't have to go far into the weeds to see that other countries are excited about this," says Levy.

Read More: Why Logistics Companies Should Site Near Research and Innovation Centers

In August, China announced a new visa targeted toward foreign professionals in science and technology that does not require the backing of a local employer. Following the initial late-September announcement of the $100,000 H-1B fee, Germany launched a campaign to woo Indian workers away from applying for work status in the U.S., emphasizing the country's strong demand for IT professionals, as well as its political stability. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney also hinted in late-September at developing a "clear offering" for foreign tech workers who would have otherwise sought to apply for H-1B status in the U.S.

Adding another layer of difficulty is the potential for legal challenges, Levy says, as well as the ensuing chaos protracted court battles present.

"Litigation produces uncertainty, and generally, uncertainty is not great for business," he points out.

On October 3, Global Nurse Force — a group representing medical professionals serving rural communities — filed the first lawsuit challenging the H-1B fee in a federal district court in California. In its filing, the coalition warned that the fee puts the U.S. at risk of losing "key innovators" across a variety of professions, including medical staff, pastors and teachers among many others. For universities, hospitals and startups, the ripple effects could be immediate: fewer research assistants in labs, delayed clinical hires in under-served regions, and tech companies forced to freeze hiring. Taken together, that could become a slow bleed on the U.S. economy that only compounds over time.

In the end, the $100,000 fee is less a budget line than a litmus test, Malik asserts, asking whether the country still wants to compete for the world’s best minds, or is comfortable watching them go elsewhere.

"The real story here is not just about numbers," says Malik. "It’s about whether the U.S. will continue to compete for global talent across all sectors of its economy, or cede ground to other countries with more accessible, less politicized immigration pathways."