• Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Supplier Directory
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Logout
  • My Profile

  • CORONAVIRUS
  • LOGISTICS
    • Air Cargo
    • All Logistics
    • Express/Small Shipments
    • Facility Location Planning
    • Freight Forwarding/Customs Brokerage
    • Global Gateways
    • Global Logistics
    • Last Mile Delivery
    • Logistics Outsourcing
    • LTL/Truckload Services
    • Ocean Transportation
    • Rail & Intermodal
    • Reverse Logistics
    • Service Parts Management
    • Transportation & Distribution
  • TECHNOLOGY
    • All Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud & On-Demand Systems
    • Data Management (Big Data/IoT/Blockchain)
    • ERP & Enterprise Systems
    • Forecasting & Demand Planning
    • Global Trade Management
    • Inventory Planning/ Optimization
    • Product Lifecycle Management
    • Sales & Operations Planning
    • SC Finance & Revenue Management
    • SC Planning & Optimization
    • Sourcing/Procurement/SRM
    • Supply Chain Visibility
    • Transportation Management
  • GENERAL SCM
    • Business Strategy Alignment
    • Education & Professional Development
    • Global Supply Chain Management
    • Global Trade & Economics
    • HR & Labor Management
    • Quality & Metrics
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • SC Security & Risk Mgmt
    • Sustainability & Corporate Social Responsibility
  • WAREHOUSING
    • All Warehouse Services
    • Conveyors & Sortation
    • Lift Trucks & AGVs
    • Order Fulfillment
    • Packaging
    • RFID, Barcode, Mobility & Voice
    • Robotics
    • Warehouse Management Systems
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace & Defense
    • Apparel
    • Automotive
    • Chemicals & Energy
    • Consumer Packaged Goods
    • E-Commerce/Omni-Channel
    • Food & Beverage
    • Healthcare
    • High-Tech/Electronics
    • Industrial Manufacturing
    • Pharmaceutical/Biotech
    • Retail
  • REGIONS
    • Asia Pacific
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • Middle East/Africa
    • North America
  • THINK TANK
  • PODCASTS
  • VIDEOS
  • WHITEPAPERS
Home » Blogs » Think Tank » Should Procurement Fear or Welcome AI and Machine Learning Technology?

Think Tank
Think Tank RSS FeedRSS

Technology / Data Management (Big Data/IoT/Blockchain) / Sourcing/Procurement/SRM / Artificial Intelligence / SC Security & Risk Mgmt

Should Procurement Fear or Welcome AI and Machine Learning Technology?

June 3, 2019
Robert J. Bowman, SupplyChainBrain
Should Procurement Fear or Welcome AI and Machine Learning Technology?

Your lengthy career in procurement has consisted largely of being beaten up by top management over the need to constantly cut supplier costs. Along comes digital technology to make your job easier — or take it away.

That, at least, is the fear of procurement professionals in the age of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Considering all of the factors that go into supplier selection and maintenance, doesn’t it make sense to hand over the task to a system that can crunch more data than a hundred humans?

And the volume of data continues to grow. Procurement managers today must draw on multiple sources of intelligence, from suppliers themselves as well as independent financial data, news reports, third-party services and social media. Says Sammeli Sammalkorpi, co-founder of procurement analytics software vendor Sievo: “Procurement organizations haven’t yet learned how to tap into these different kinds of data.”

AI and machine learning would seem especially well-suited to the challenge. But fears that they’ll take over the job entirely seem unfounded. When it comes to effective procurement and supplier management, the foreseeable future is one of collaboration between human and machine.

“I really believe that the role of AI is not to replace humans,” says Sammalkorpi. “Machine learning and AI can propose findings, but you still need to adjust to what’s relevant, and what’s not.”

Machines are highly effective for narrow applications, involving well-defined problems. What’s more, they’re always “on” and entail a minimal cost of operation, when compared to the salary and benefits of a human worker.

Comes time to take action, however, and the flesh-and-blood manager needs to step in. Simply put, humans are still better at making the final judgment about key suppliers. For the time being, at least, “machine learning is still not reliable enough to drive decisions,” Sammalkorpi says. (There’s another reason for keeping humans in in the loop, he adds: they need to retain responsibility for making choices so that they don’t end up blaming the machine for wrong ones.)

In the early stages of machine learning, the technology can likely take over certain elements of the supplier contract. As it improves, however, buyers will find themselves relying on the system for an increasing number of tasks, if not the final decision on supplier vetting and selection.

Because AI and machine learning depend heavily on complex algorithms, companies might assume that they need to hire a expensive team of data scientists to run the system and make sense of its conclusions. In Sammalkorpi’s opinion, that’s not the case for the procurement department. He believes that kind of expertise is better obtained from an outsourced provider.

“Even if they thought it was a good business case,” he says, “we’re not seeing a lot of organizations capable of retaining that talent in house. You still need data scientists, but I don’t think the procurement organization is the right place for them.”

Predicting future outcomes is likely to be as tough for a machine as for a human — in other words, impossible. But machine learning is good at quickly revising forecasts and action plans in real time, to reflect actual purchasing patterns, Sammalkorpi believes.

All of this assumes, of course, that procurement can smoothly incorporate the new technology into its operations. But new research from Forrester Consulting, commissioned by procurement platform vendor Ivalua, suggests that this is far from the case. Employing a “digital maturity index” to assess companies’ progress in adopting procurement technology, Forrester found that most are “significantly overestimating” their level of maturity in that respect.

Sixty-five percent of companies surveyed considered themselves to be “advanced,” but only 16 percent had the requisite level of digital maturity in their procurement organizations to justify that assessment.

One problem is that many companies make poor initial choices in selecting procurement technology. In the Forrester study, 82 percent had switched or were considering switching tech providers, citing as reasons poor levels of supplier onboarding and user adoption.

Moreover, the adoption period was excessively long. Just 17 percent of organizations were able to onboard new suppliers in less than a month, and 59 percent were taking between one and three months for each supplier.

“Procurement leaders have the opportunity to deliver a true competitive advantage for their organizations,” David Khuat-Duy, corporate chief executive officer of Ivalua, said in a statement. “Digital transformation is critical to success, but requires a realistic assessment of current maturity, a clear vision for each stage of the journey and the right technology.”

All of which suggests that technology in the form of AI and machine learning is a long way from jettisoning humans from the procurement function, even as it promises to enhance operations when properly assessed and implemented.

RELATED CONTENT

RELATED VIDEOS

Wake up to Coronavirus Updates and the latest Supply Chain News!

Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter

Timely, incisive articles delivered directly to your inbox.

Popular Stories

  • Coronavirus-watch-Armada

    Virus Update: Biden Team to Buy 200 Million More Doses; Pfizer to Boost Deliveries

    Coronavirus
  • Car Industry

    A Year of Poor Planning Led to Carmakers’ Massive Chip Shortage

    Technology
  • The World Is Dangerously Dependent on Taiwan for Semiconductors

    The World Is Dangerously Dependent on Taiwan for Semiconductors

    Technology
  • Supply-Chain and Procurement Software in 2021

    Ten Predictions for Supply-Chain and Procurement Software in 2021

    Coronavirus
  • California Trucker

    Why One Southern California Trucker Stays Independent

    Logistics

Digital Edition

Scb home issue 27

2020 Supply Chain Innovator of the Year

VIEW THE LATEST ISSUE

Case Studies

  • LSP Saves Customer $1.5 Million a Year With MPO Global Inbound Management

  • Auto Supplier Wows Key Client Using riskmethods Supply Chain Savvy

  • Integrating Shipping and Compliance Saves Conglomerate Millions

  • How a Consumer Goods Giant Upped Its On-Time Delivery Performance

  • LSP Wows Global Client, Quickly Advances to Become End-to-End Provider

Visit Our Sponsors

6 River Systems ArcBest Armada
aThingz BluJay Burris Logistics
DSC Logistics DCSA (Digital Container Shipping Association) DHL Resilience360
Genpact GEP Honeywell Intelligrated
Infor Logility Magnitude Software
MPO Old Dominion Oliver Wight
OpenSky Ports America Purolator
QAD Precision Red Classic Riskmethods
TGW Systems Transportation Insights Watson Land Company
Westfalia Technologies Workjam Yang Ming
  • More From SCB
    • Featured Content
    • Video Library
    • Think Tank Blog
    • SupplyChainBrain Podcast
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Digital Offerings
    • Digital Issue
    • Subscribe
    • Manage Your Subscription
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Events Calendar
    • SCB's Great Supply Chain Partners
    • Supplier Directory
    • Case Study Showcase
    • Supply Chain Innovation Awards
    • 100 Great Partners Form
  • SCB Corporate
    • Advertise on SCB.COM
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Data Sharing Opt-Out

All content copyright © 2016 - 2018 Keller International Publishing Corp All rights reserved. No reproduction, transmission or display is permitted without the written permissions of Keller International Publishing Corp

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing