• Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Supplier Directory
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Logout
  • My Profile
  • LOGISTICS
    • Air Cargo
    • All Logistics
    • Express/Small Shipments
    • Facility Location Planning
    • Freight Forwarding/Customs Brokerage
    • Global Gateways
    • Global Logistics
    • Last Mile Delivery
    • Logistics Outsourcing
    • LTL/Truckload Services
    • Ocean Transportation
    • Rail & Intermodal
    • Reverse Logistics
    • Service Parts Management
    • Transportation & Distribution
  • TECHNOLOGY
    • All Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud & On-Demand Systems
    • Data Management
    • ERP & Enterprise Systems
    • Forecasting & Demand Planning
    • Global Trade Management
    • Inventory Planning/ Optimization
    • Product Lifecycle Management
    • Sales & Operations Planning
    • SC Finance & Revenue Management
    • SC Planning & Optimization
    • Sourcing/Procurement/SRM
    • Supply Chain Visibility
    • Transportation Management
  • GENERAL SCM
    • Business Strategy Alignment
    • Education & Professional Development
    • Global Supply Chain Management
    • Global Trade & Economics
    • HR & Labor Management
    • Quality & Metrics
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • SC Security & Risk Mgmt
    • Sustainability & Corporate Social Responsibility
  • WAREHOUSING
    • All Warehouse Services
    • Conveyors & Sortation
    • Lift Trucks & AGVs
    • Order Fulfillment
    • Packaging
    • RFID, Barcode, Mobility & Voice
    • Robotics
    • Warehouse Management Systems
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace & Defense
    • Apparel
    • Automotive
    • Chemicals & Energy
    • Consumer Packaged Goods
    • E-Commerce/Omni-Channel
    • Food & Beverage
    • Healthcare
    • High-Tech/Electronics
    • Industrial Manufacturing
    • Pharmaceutical/Biotech
    • Retail
  • REGIONS
    • Asia Pacific
    • Canada
    • China
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • Middle East/Africa
    • North America
  • BLOG
  • PODCASTS
  • VIDEOS
  • WHITEPAPERS
Home » Blogs » Think Tank » A University Lawsuit Highlights the Interdependence of Global Supply Chains

Think Tank
Think Tank RSS FeedRSS

Regulation & Compliance

A University Lawsuit Highlights the Interdependence of Global Supply Chains

September 30, 2019
Robert J. Bowman, SupplyChainBrain
0911_HereAreThisYears.jpg

When it comes to products that infringe on patents, retailers that sell them are just as vulnerable to legal action as the manufacturers that make them.

That became evident to five retailing giants when they were sued by the regents of the University of California this summer for selling a type of light bulb for which UC claims to hold the patents.

The product at issue is a light bulb employing filament LED technology to resemble the traditional incandescent light bulb, but lasting much longer and using 90% less energy. It was developed at the Solid State Lighting and Energy Electronics Center at UC Santa Barbara, by a team led by Professor Shuji Nakamura, winner of the 2014 Nobel Prize for Physics.

While the usual target of a patent-infringement suit is the unauthorized manufacturer of the product in question, that entity can be hard to reach through U.S. courts when it’s located outside the country. So UC has named in its lawsuit five major American retailers that it alleges are selling its patented light bulb without permission: Amazon.com, Bed Bath & Beyond, Ikea, Target Corp. and Walmart.

At the same time, at the behest of UC, the U.S. International Trade Commission has announced that it will undertake an investigation into the allegedly unauthorized importation and sales of the university’s patented LED technology.

UC calls its legal action a “first-of-its-kind” patent-enforcement campaign. It is intended to “promote respect” for the university’s patent rights, the regents said.

The action is unusual in that a university system is seeking relief from ITC, a course rarely pursued by academic patent owners. It also signals a newfound aggressiveness on the part of academic institutions to defend patents for products and technology developed under their auspices.

For global supply chains, the suit delivers the message that no party involved in the unauthorized manufacture, movement and sale of product is immune from legal action.

It’s common for universities to hold patents for products that are subsequently commercialized, notes Seth Levy, partner in the law firm of Nixon Peabody LLP, which is representing the UC regents. Technology transfer has been a function at most universities for decades, he says.

More recently, university technology-transfer offices have been doing a better job of vetting patents for products that are viable in the marketplace, Levy says. That trend tracks with the UC system’s decision to become more aggressive about enforcing its patents in the outside world.

Universities are especially vulnerable to patent infringements because academics tend to publicize their achievements in publications and lectures. Private companies, by contrast, are more apt to keep key elements of their research and development efforts under wraps.

Moreover, the private sector tends to be more aggressive in pursuing patent infringements because they threaten profits. “Universities exist in a very different environment,” says Levy. “Their main business isn’t enforcing IT. It’s education and research that benefits the community.”

Nevertheless, academic institutions are waking up to the value of their patents, and becoming more intent on protecting the fruits of their efforts. “It’s a very important trend going forward,” Levy says.

Up to now, there has only been a handful of significant cases involving charges by universities of patent infringement. While many lawsuits have involved patented technology, they have mostly been filed by private companies that licensed the universities’ intellectual property (IP). “Only in very rare cases does a university do it on its own,” says Levy.

That’s changing as universities become more aware of the value of technology transfer. It has only been a “cottage industry” since the early 1980s, Levy says, and universities have spent the last 40 yours building up their patent estates and gradually understanding the commercial implications of their inventions.

The creation of incubators, accelerators and captive funds to support IP development has prompted universities to take a fresh look at the value of their technology.

For any patent holder, it can be tough reaching violators, especially if they are located beyond U.S. borders or several tiers up the supply chain. But patents give holders the right to prevent others from make use of their inventions wherever that might occur. And that means retailers can be pulled in as defendants. “If you want to see where infringement exists,” says Levy, “you just need to go into stores and shop.”

Private technology companies are less likely to sue retailers because the latter are their direct customers, Levy notes. Universities aren’t customarily bound by that relationship.

Plaintiffs in the UC light bulb cases aren’t specifying damages. What they want, Levy says, is “license agreements with retailers where they’re paid a reasonable royalty on product sales.” The potential for retroactive damages is relatively small because the technology is so new, he adds.

Levy says UC is hoping for “very quick negotiations” that will head off an expensive and protracted lawsuit against defendants with deep pockets. But even if this case settles soon, it should serve as a long-term reminder of the tight bonds and interdependencies within global supply chains. When one partner gets hit, everyone feels the pain.

RELATED CONTENT

RELATED VIDEOS

Get regular updates!
Subscribe to our newsletter

Enjoy curated articles directly to your inbox.

Popular Stories

  • 1209_themarketforlogistics

    How an Investment Banker Views the Market for Logistics and Supply-Chain Tech

    Technology
  • 1206_howglobaltradersplan

    Podcast | How Global Traders Can ‘Plan for Crazy’

    Global Trade Management
  • 1210_cultureoffeargripsups

    ‘Culture of Fear’ Grips UPS: Workers Say Injuries Are Underreported

    Logistics
  • 1125_themodernfactory

    The ‘Modern’ Factory Remains a Dream for Many Manufacturers

    Technology
  • 1118_howconsumerproductscompanies

    How Consumer-Products Companies Are Wasting Their Digital Spend

    Technology

Digital Edition

55746

Subscribe today and receive the latest issue

Start Your Subscription

Case Studies

  • Energy Storage Company Saves $50 Million With Demand Planning

  • Locus Robotics Helps E-Retailer Deliver During Holiday Peak

  • Manufacturer Slashes Shipping Costs With AI Packaging Solution

  • Apparel Retailer Saves $45 Million With Reverse Logistics Solution

  • QuestaWeb Configures Fragrance Company’s Complex Procedures Into Its Advanced FTZ Software

Visit Our Sponsors

  • More From SCB
    • Featured Content
    • Video Library
    • Think Tank Blog
    • SupplyChainBrain Podcast
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • The Magazine
    • Digital Issue
    • Subscribe
    • Manage Your Subscription
    • 100 Great Partners Form
  • Resources
    • Newsletters
    • Events Calendar
    • SCB's Great Supply Chain Partners
    • Supplier Directory
    • Case Study Showcase
    • Supply Chain Innovation Awards
  • SCB Corporate
    • Advertise on SCB.COM
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us

All content copyright © 2016 - 2018 Keller International Publishing Corp All rights reserved. No reproduction, transmission or display is permitted without the written permissions of Keller International Publishing Corp

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing